About NNN
Since March 2005, New Nebraska Network has been the state's premier source of progressive online political commentary and community-building.

Please support our efforts by becoming engaged, spreading the word, and contributing what you can towards our continued growth as a voice for change in Nebraska politics.


Join the Network

Frontpage RSS Feed

Diaries RSS Feed

Daily E-mail Updates

Read NNN Archives
(pre-August 2007)

Managing Editor:
Kyle Michaelis,
kyle@newnebraska.net

NNN is a meritocracy. Contribute and you will be rewarded.

Poll
What interests you the most at the Nebraska Democratic Party's 2010 State Convention being held this weekend in Columbus?
Gubernatorial nomination (if contested)
State Chair's race (if contested)
Debate of new platform and resolutions
Fate of 2012 presidential caucus
George McGovern speaking at dinner
Not going and not interested

Results

Search




Advanced Search


Event Calendar
July 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * * 01 02 03
04 05 06 07 08 09 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
* * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Local Blog Roll
  • Neal Obermeyer 'Toons
  • Paul Fell Cartoons
  • Bill Dunn Cartoons
  • NE Appleseed Blog
  • Blog for Rural America
  • NDP Blog for Nebraska
  • Omaha Blog
  • BJ Nebraska
  • Freedom Road Project
  • Lincolnite
  • Public Christian
  • The Dark Stuff
  • Revolution-21
  • The Watchdog Post
  • Scenic Route (GI Ind.)
  • AgLines (GI Ind.)
  • Omaha TV News
  • Harold W. Andersen
  • Nebraska Watchdog
  • Leavenworth Street
  • Objective Conservative
  • Red State Eclectic
  • Heartland Notebook
  • Weird Harold
  • Don't Let Me Stop You
  • Economic Trends
  • Right-Wing Professor
  • Art Diamond Blog
  • Vital Signs
  • Domestic Divapalooza
  • Unicam Watch (Rep.)
  • Grassroots In NE
  • Patriotic Resistance
  • From The Heartland
  • Nebraska Redneck
  • One Out In The Third
  • Plains Feeder
  • Mark Fahleson

  • 50 State Blog Network
  • Alabama
  • Arizona
  • California
  • Colorado
  • Connecticut
  • DailyKos
  • Firedoglake
  • Florida
  • Georgia
  • Idaho
  • Illinois
  • Indiana
  • Iowa
  • Louisiana
  • Maine
  • Maryland
  • Massachusetts
  • Michigan
  • Minnesota
  • Missouri
  • Montana
  • MyDD
  • Nebraska
  • Nevada
  • New Hampshire
  • New Jersey
  • New Mexico
  • New York (a)
  • New York (b)
  • North Carolina
  • North Dakota
  • Ohio (a)
  • Ohio (b)
  • Oklahoma
  • Open Left
  • Oregon
  • Pennsylvania
  • Rhode Island
  • Swing State Project
  • Tennessee
  • Texas (a)
  • Texas (b)
  • Utah
  • Vermont
  • Virginia
  • Washington
  • West Virginia
  • Wisconsin

  • Finish The Job - The Need For Reform Remains Unchanged

    by: Nebraska Appleseed

    Wed Jan 27, 2010 at 16:03:04 PM CST


    This past week has been full of speculation about the future of health care reform which has been frustrating for health care reform advocates.  Many of us have worked tirelessly this past year to make comprehensive health care reform a reality, coming further than any previous generation.  The recent shift in the Senate should not and does not mean the end of reform.

    The status of health care in our country is exactly the same today as it was before the Massachusetts election.  Our broken health care system remains unaffordable and unsustainable for millions of Americans.  And the fierce need for comprehensive health reform remains unchanged.

    Today, there are still more than 220,000 Nebraskans - over 45,000 of which are children - who remain uninsured.  The many Nebraskans who have insurance continue to face soaring premiums, deductibles, and out-of-pocket costs.  Too many Nebraskans pay their annual premiums and still have to fight for the coverage they paid for.  Too many face denials of coverage altogether, or risk medical bankruptcy.  Those who have lost their jobs, and thus their employer provided coverage, struggle to find affordable insurance, particularly those with pre-existing health conditions.

    These are not just statistics or generalizations.  This past year, we've met so many Nebraskans who have shared with us their stories and exemplified why our leaders cannot hesitate or balk at enacting comprehensive reform.

    Coverage is truly unaffordable for even those who are lucky enough to have it. Jeanne, an Omaha native, despite having employer provided insurance, can barely afford the combined costs of her monthly diabetes, blood pressure, and cholesterol medications and her co-pays for regular health screenings.  The effects of pre-existing condition denials are real.  Darwin, a Vietnam veteran, cannot retire or move jobs because he must maintain his private health insurance to cover his wife who cannot qualify for insurance in the private market because she has diabetes.

    And the effects on our small businesses are real.  We hear from many people like Todd, a self-employed auto mechanic, whose premiums have more than doubled since he first purchased his policy.  Dennis, another small business owner, knows personally that our health system fails both small business owners and families.  As a business owner, he can't afford to provide his part-time or full-time employees health coverage.  With his family policy, Dennis's deductible more than doubled with his previous insurer.  After he switched insurers he endured the cruel act of having his insurer pre-approve his wife's $15,000 surgery only to have that same insurer deny coverage after the surgery was done.  His insurer suddenly claimed she had a "pre-existing condition."

    Nebraska Appleseed :: Finish The Job - The Need For Reform Remains Unchanged
    These are only a few of the stories we've heard.  It has been remarkable to see how everyone is touched by the flaws and huge gaps in our system.  Everyone seems to have a health care story - and not a good one.

    This system is not sustainable.  We cannot ignore these harsh realities of today's health care system or the price we will pay if our leaders fail to enact reform.  Without reform, these trends will continue.  That is guaranteed.

    The reform bills passed by the House and Senate will address so many of the most basic problems and injustices of our current system.  Millions more would have access to affordable coverage.  Many families in Nebraska would have access to premium tax credits.  Small businesses would have tax credits to help them provide coverage for their employees.  Insurers would no longer be allowed to charge widely different premiums for the same benefits based on your health status or just because you are a woman.  

    These basic steps towards a more fair and humane health care system are critical.  Massachusetts has shown that health reform works, with 98% of people covered and insurers not allowed to deny people based on pre-existing conditions. It's time for the rest of the country to have the same access to good, affordable care.

    It's the right decision morally.  It's the right decision economically.  It is the right decision for the health and prosperity of our state and our country.  Congress should not back away from this opportunity.  Time will show that those who voted for health care reform and moved this country forward were on the right side of history.

    Rebecca L. Gould
    Executive Director
    Nebraska Appleseed Center for Law in the Public Interest

    Tags: , , , (All Tags)
    Print Friendly View Send As Email
    You are focusing on the wrong problem (0.00 / 0)
    Premiums have gone up because health care costs keep going up.  Why do you think you can focus on insurance to solve the problem?

    Insurance is pooled risk.  If the payouts keep getting more expensive (improved health technology costs more, and litigation costs keep going up) and the insurance pool has to pay out more often (american's continual decline in health and increase in obesity), then of course costs are going to go up.

    And regarding this bill - people don't want it (all reputable polls show more than 50% of american's don't want it) because its so much more than a government insurance plan.  It really is the "government takeover" the pundits claim.  My guess is most of you have only heard what comes out of your politician's mouth.  If you read whats in the bill I doubt you'd be as excited about it.


    How is it a government takeover? (0.00 / 0)
    Defend your thesis.  I suspect you can't

    [ Parent ]
    Cutting Costs (0.00 / 0)
    Litigation costs are a very small part of the total costs in the health care system.  Litigation may even have a net positive effect on the system.  If it forces incompetent practitioners out of the field it reduces total costs by preventing the incompetent from doing ever more costly and permanent damage to their patients/victims.  The AMA insists on the right of physicians to police their own membership, but in reality they maintain a system that protects the marginally incompetent and grossly incompetent members as long as they pay their association fees and only on rare occasions does it suspend rights to practice for those quacks that are certifiably criminally incompetent.  They may be dedicated to maintaining professional standards, but they have guaranteed that those standards are extremely low.  An orthopedic surgeon whose level of incompetence might preclude him or her from practicing in a large metropolitan area will find open arms waiting in underserved rural areas where the standard is "anything is better than nothing."  In this rural environment the marginally and grossly incompetent surgeon is generally not in a strictly private practice, but has a contract with a local hospital that guarantees a certain wage.  Local general practitioners are then "encouraged" to refer their patients to the new quack on the block.  If the surgeons skill level proves to be deficient enough that the local general practitioners refuse to endanger any more of their patients by referring them to the local guy, the hospitals will fail to renew the contract and start looking for another butcher with a higher skill level.

    Technology costs are artificially forced ever higher by the present system.  New technology is initially too expensive for most medical facilities. Not only because of high research and development costs, but also because the medical equipment producers recognize that limited production in the initial introduction phase of these technologies helps keep the purchase price artificially high.  Purchase prices drop gradually as the high bidder's desires are satisfied, but production levels are still restricted to keep profit margins high.  After the hospital market is tapped for the maximum amount of cash, the medical equipment providers send their sales staff out to pedal the now much lower priced equipment to specialty clinics where physicians can form a corporation to provide this new technology to their patients and obtain a high return on their investment in equipment.  They go into direct competition with the hospitals for the profitable procedures, and have the upper hand since they now refer all their patients to their private fleecing operation.  They even have a perverse incentive to over prescribe since every referral they make benefits them financially.  It's a system that is hugely profitable to physicians and equipment providers, with hospitals, patients and insurers paying the bill.  It works out particularly well for the equipment venders since a large part of the research for the technology they hold the patents on was paid for by the tax payers through research grants to public and private universities.

    If you honestly want to reduce litigation costs in the health care system the quickest and most effective way to do that is to implement a universal single payer health care system right now.  The largest part of all legal settlements is for past present and future medical expenses, and a single payer system would reduce the recovery to plaintiffs for those charges to nothing.  Lawyers don't work for free and without the medical costs there isn't a lot of profit left in the litigation.

    Technology costs would also be reduced by implementing a single payer system.  Single payer would eliminate physician owned testing facilities that only operate a few hours a week by reducing reimbursement rates.  Hospitals could then base all rate negotiations on actual costs and stop operating on a ludicrous model where they lose money on some procedures and make money on others.


    [ Parent ]
    costs (0.00 / 0)
    one of the major costs are uncompensated care.  If everyone can pay then the costs are spread out over the entire pool.  
    When people are informed what is in the bill and what it will mean for them they are for it.
    The "government takeover" is a common lie that has been used to fearmonger healthcare for decades

    [ Parent ]
    New Nebraska Network
    Not Just Red to Blue - More than One Label for Another


    Active Users
    Currently 3 user(s) logged on.

    Menu

    Make a New Account

    Username:

    Password:



    Forget your username or password?


    NNN on Twitter

    101st Legislature

    Progressive Partners
  • Coalition For Lifesaving Cures
  • Nebraskans For Obama
  • Change That Works - Nebraska
  • Nebraska Democratic Party
  • Nebraska Young Democrats
  • Nebraskans for Peace
  • Center for Rural Affairs
  • Nebraska Appleseed Center
  • Center for People in Need
  • ACLU Nebraska
  • Sierra Club Nebraska
  • Common Cause Nebraska
  • Voices For Children
  • Opportunity@Work
  • Power Up Nebraska

  • Politicians & Candidates
  • Tom White for Congress (D-02)
  • Mark Lakers for Governor (D)
  • Mark Stoj for Treasurer (D)
  • Janet Stewart for Sec/State (D)
  • Rebekah Davis for Cong. (D-03)
  • Lee Terry for Congress (R-02)
  • Dave Heineman for Governor (R)
  • Tom Nesbitt for Treasurer (R)
  • Tony Fulton for Treasurer (R)
  • Don Stenberg for Treasurer (R)
  • John Gale for Sec/State (R)
  • Adrian Smith for Congress (R-03)
  • Bruning for Atty Gen (R)
  • Sen. Ben Nelson (D)
  • Sen. Mike Johanns (R)
  • Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (R-01)
  • Rep. Lee Terry (R-02)
  • Rep. Adrian Smith (R-03)
  • Governor's Office
  • Atty General's Office
  • Sec. of State's Office
  • Unicameral Directory
  • Mayor Jim Suttle (D, Omaha)
  • Mayor Chris Beutler (D, Lincoln)
  • Nebraska Democratic Party
  • Nebraska Green Party
  • Nebraska Republican Party

  • Local Media
  • Nebraska State Paper
  • Prairie Fire
  • The Reader
  • North Platte Bulletin
  • Sandhills Express
  • Southwest Nebraska News
  • NET Nebraska Public Radio
  • KFAB Talk Radio (Omaha)
  • KLIN Talk Radio (Lincoln)
  • Channel 3 - CBS (Omaha)
  • Channel 4 - ABC (Kearney)
  • Channel 5 - NBC (Hastings)
  • Channel 6 - NBC (Omaha)
  • Channel 7 - ABC (Omaha)
  • Channel 8 - ABC (Lincoln)
  • Channel 10 - CBS (Lincoln)
  • Channel 42 - Fox (Omaha)

  • Submit a Letter to the Editor
  • Omaha World-Herald
  • Lincoln Journal-Star
  • Daily Nebraskan (UNL)
  • Grand Island Independent
  • Kearney Hub
  • North Platte Telegraph
  • Norfolk Daily News
  • Fremont Tribune
  • Columbus Telegram
  • McCook Daily Gazette
  • Scottsbluff Star-Herald
  • Hastings Tribune

  • Powered by: SoapBlox