About NNN
Since March 2005, New Nebraska Network has been the state's premier source of progressive online political commentary and community-building.

Please support our efforts by becoming engaged, spreading the word, and contributing what you can towards our continued growth as a voice for change in Nebraska politics.


Join the Network

Frontpage RSS Feed

Diaries RSS Feed

Daily E-mail Updates

Read NNN Archives
(pre-August 2007)

Managing Editor:
Kyle Michaelis,
kyle@newnebraska.net

NNN is a meritocracy. Contribute and you will be rewarded.

Poll
What interests you the most at the Nebraska Democratic Party's 2010 State Convention being held this weekend in Columbus?
Gubernatorial nomination (if contested)
State Chair's race (if contested)
Debate of new platform and resolutions
Fate of 2012 presidential caucus
George McGovern speaking at dinner
Not going and not interested

Results

Search




Advanced Search


Event Calendar
July 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * * 01 02 03
04 05 06 07 08 09 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
* * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Local Blog Roll
  • Neal Obermeyer 'Toons
  • Paul Fell Cartoons
  • Bill Dunn Cartoons
  • NE Appleseed Blog
  • Blog for Rural America
  • NDP Blog for Nebraska
  • Omaha Blog
  • BJ Nebraska
  • Freedom Road Project
  • Lincolnite
  • Public Christian
  • The Dark Stuff
  • Revolution-21
  • The Watchdog Post
  • Scenic Route (GI Ind.)
  • AgLines (GI Ind.)
  • Omaha TV News
  • Harold W. Andersen
  • Nebraska Watchdog
  • Leavenworth Street
  • Objective Conservative
  • Red State Eclectic
  • Heartland Notebook
  • Weird Harold
  • Don't Let Me Stop You
  • Economic Trends
  • Right-Wing Professor
  • Art Diamond Blog
  • Vital Signs
  • Domestic Divapalooza
  • Unicam Watch (Rep.)
  • Grassroots In NE
  • Patriotic Resistance
  • From The Heartland
  • Nebraska Redneck
  • One Out In The Third
  • Plains Feeder
  • Mark Fahleson

  • 50 State Blog Network
  • Alabama
  • Arizona
  • California
  • Colorado
  • Connecticut
  • DailyKos
  • Firedoglake
  • Florida
  • Georgia
  • Idaho
  • Illinois
  • Indiana
  • Iowa
  • Louisiana
  • Maine
  • Maryland
  • Massachusetts
  • Michigan
  • Minnesota
  • Missouri
  • Montana
  • MyDD
  • Nebraska
  • Nevada
  • New Hampshire
  • New Jersey
  • New Mexico
  • New York (a)
  • New York (b)
  • North Carolina
  • North Dakota
  • Ohio (a)
  • Ohio (b)
  • Oklahoma
  • Open Left
  • Oregon
  • Pennsylvania
  • Rhode Island
  • Swing State Project
  • Tennessee
  • Texas (a)
  • Texas (b)
  • Utah
  • Vermont
  • Virginia
  • Washington
  • West Virginia
  • Wisconsin

  • The Case for Scott Kleeb

    by: Ryan Anderson

    Tue Nov 13, 2007 at 12:44:28 PM CST


    Bob Kerrey and Mike Fahey deserve our respect and our thanks for their continued service to our state and our party.  I'm confident either man would've made a formidable candidate and a fantastic U.S. Senator.

    But their decisions have not closed the door on this race.  Rather, they have opened the opportunity for a new brand of politics to take root in Nebraska.  I'm sure few of you doubt Scott Kleeb would make an excellent addition to the United States Senate, but allow me to take a moment to examine his chances in what is sure to be a difficult statewide campaign.

    The Map:
    How do you turn a 10-point congressional loss into a victory statewide?  A basic formula for success is provided by  the American Almanac of Politics in their description of the Senate race in 2000: "Nelson won 51%-49%, carrying the Omaha area 54%-46% and the Lincoln area 60%-39%; he lost the remaining half of the state 54%-46%".

    Of course, that "remaining half of the state" includes not only the third district but most of the first as well.  According to my own calculations, Ben Nelson received 109,726 of 241,468 votes  in NE-03, or about 45.4%... more or less exactly Kleeb's result in 2006.

    Ryan Anderson :: The Case for Scott Kleeb
    But as impressive as those numbers are, the two elections are not wholly comparable.  While both Nelson and Kleeb were running in open seats for federal office, Nelson managed his victory in a presidential year with higher turnout overall (a traditionally difficult feat in ruby red Nebraska).  In an effort to correct for this imbalance somewhat, I decided to measure both Democrats against each other rather than against their Republican opponents.  The result is a clear geographical pattern represented on this series of maps:

    As you can see, Kleeb generally outperformed Nelson in the most Republican parts of the state (specifically in the Panhandle and the Sandhills) while generally underperforming him in the more Democratic counties to the south and the east.  This pattern isn't obviously explained by the differences between presidential and midterm elections, but they may be the result of depressed Democratic turnout due to the robo-calls controversy (highlighted here in red are the cities of Kearney and Hastings, where most of these calls were placed) or the effect of late-airing attack ads in the Lincoln market.  What these maps suggest is Kleeb's potential for further growth  even within the third district itself... something which is especially apparent if you consider Scott's hometown of Dunning (highlighted here in black).  As you can see, the whole surrounding area drastically improved its Democratic performance in '06.  Kleeb now lives in Hastings, the part of the third district where his potential for growth is greatest.

    Having proven viability in NE-03, Scott Kleeb has already overcome the highest hurdle any Nebraska Democrat must face. The race now depends on his potential in the remaining two districts, and on that front our outlook is especially promising.  Let's not forget that Mike Johanns lost Lincoln in 1998 (when he ran as their sitting mayor!) and Omaha voted for a Democratic novice in 2006 over their own four term incumbent Congressman.

    Low Expectations:
    Look, I'm no elections expert, and I don't expect anyone to mistake me for one.  I don't expect the information provided above will alter any perception among the mainstream press or the conservative blogosphere that this race is already lost.  But that's just fine with me: I welcome any Republican to doubt us.

    Republican confidence in a general election victory only increases the odds of a bloody and prolonged primary fight and decreases the chance that any national GOP money will be spent.  Low expectations can buy time, time enough to lay the groundwork and build the momentum necessary for an upset to occur.  Of course, all that is possible only if a third condition is met:

    High Energy:
    Kleeb can't do this alone.  What we have before us is a challenge... and also an opportunity.  An opportunity to take part in a generational shift in the way our politics work, a shift not unlike that experienced when Bob Kerrey ran in '82, or Chuck Hagel ran in '96.  Our challenge is to commit to this race all the time, energy and resources necessary to make that change take hold.

    That means volunteer hours.  That means campaign donations.  But that also means faith, trust and belief.  Faith in our our neighbors to keep an open mind and not allow our state's conservative media convince them that this race is over.  Trust that if we work hard for this cause that our efforts will be rewarded.  And belief in the potential, not only of Scott Kleeb, but of Nebraska itself.  Our potential for growth, our capacity for change.

    We can make that happen.  This can be our time to lead.  We need only to get up and do it.

    You can start by making a donation here.

    Tags: , , , (All Tags)
    Print Friendly View Send As Email
    Nice (0.00 / 0)
    Fantastic research Ryan and a nice image, I suggest you put it at full resolution in the post. One question, why the dot for Dunning? Doesn't Kleeb live in Hastings now?

    The dot for Dunning (0.00 / 0)
    Is just an interesting piece of trivia.  Notice that the whole surrounding area saw its Democratic performance increase dramatically.  Kleeb now lives in Hastings, the part of the third district where his potential for growth is greatest.  Think of the possibilities!

    [ Parent ]
    Good point, you should put that in the post too. (0.00 / 0)


    [ Parent ]
    Done (0.00 / 0)
    The reason I left it out originally was because  it always looked sloppy when I included it.  But oh well, this post is supposed to be more substance than fireworks.

    [ Parent ]
    BTW (0.00 / 0)
    I have no idea how to change the resolution on the maps.  Any tips?

    [ Parent ]
    um... (0.00 / 0)
    If you didn't scale it down on purpose, then the soapblox software must scale it down automatically. You should probably be able to override that with the addition of the specific width and height. Your image is 506 x 601, so the img tag should look like this:

    img src="http://bp2.blogger.c... " width="506" height="601"

    contained in the obvious "< >" tags.


    [ Parent ]
    Huh (0.00 / 0)
    When I do that, the picture doesn't seem to load at all.  Unfortunately, I have to go to work pretty soon so the image will probably have to remain as it is.  Thanks for your help, though.

    [ Parent ]
    hmmn (0.00 / 0)
    Ah, I see. Your image host actually has two different versions of the file at two different resolutions, and they must not let you use the high res version embedded in another site? Oh well, people can at least click on it to see it at full res.

    [ Parent ]
    Kos' poll (0.00 / 0)
    So if Kos' poll that he talked about turns out to be a bad outlook for Kleeb? Will he publish it anyway? I'm really interested in the results.

    I'm guessing (0.00 / 0)
    That the benchmark poll won't be that great, but that should be no surprise.  We always knew this would be an upset, and an upset is about momentum and dynamics... not about a snapshot of name recognition and support taken a full year before the election.

    [ Parent ]
    Oooo... pretty maps! (0.00 / 0)
    Thanks for your analysis, Ryan.  It is really interesting, and I think quite encouraging as well.

    The way I see it. (0.00 / 0)
    Mr. Anderson's analysis of Kleeb's potential is symptomatic of the quandary the Nebraska Democratic Party finds itself in.  In a nutshell, "it's too bad our best hope lives in New York City."  Or, in terms of the next best thing, Kleeb "his near win in the 3rd." 
    Certainly the Dems do a good job when it comes to Senator Nelson, but that in no way translates into success in any other statewide election.

    The funny thing about elections is that they are all circumstantial and those circumstances change with every new election. 

    Kleeb's first go at elective office in the third saw:
    Kleeb as unopposed in a Democratic primary.  It is more than likely that had there been a challenger, Kleeb would not have emerged as the Democratic nominee;
    Turnout was hugely inflated in an off-year election.

    Nelson-Stenberg in 2000 saw:
    Nelson as the media darling;
    Stenberg as an (arguably) weak candidate;
    Nelson outspent Stenberg.  Because he was (weak) the National party did not support him.

    Having said all of that, the hope, as penned by Anderson, is that Kleeb will do what he did in 2006, only better and will duplicate it all over the rest of the state.  I guess, if I were a Nebraska Democratic strategist and Kleeb was all I had, that's what I would hope for as well.

    Anderson Asks "How to turn a 10point loss into a statewide victory? 

    Answer, you don't!

    The Republican advantage over the Democrats in registered voters has increased since 2000 by nearly 36,000.  That's almost 50% of the margin of victory Nelson had over Stenberg.
    Omaha is no longer a Democrat majority city.  With the annexation of Elkhorn, it is unlikely that any statewide Democrat will win the City of Omaha, except for maybe Senator Nelson. 

    The long and the short of it is Kleeb will more than likely win Lincoln and maybe the first, but he will come up with goose eggs in the second and the third.  If he campaigned on what he really represents, the loss would mirror that of Heineman-Hahn.

    To be sure, Democrats have had some success, but it is not because their candidates were "mainstream" Democrats.  They campaigned as a Republican, on Republican issues.

    I certainly wish Mr. Kleeb well and hope that he ultimately decides to get in the Senate race.  Keeping in mind that while elections aren't re-runs, campaigns often times, are.  Kleeb will be the only candidate, and again, he more than likely would not emerge if it were a crowed field, or even just a field of two. 

    However, Republicans still have the numbers, the ideas and the candidates.  The best candidate will emerge from the primary, stronger and have more depth because of it.  He will not try to sell himself as something he is not, and try to "BRAND" it as something new.


    Alrighty... (0.00 / 0)
    I have no idea if Kleeb would have won a primary out west, but I'm pretty sure he'd win in a primary statewide. I think most people would bet that a guy who got 45% out west will have a better shot at winning statewide than an Omaha Mayor, and this is coming from a guy who has lived in Omaha pretty much my whole life and is a fan of Fahey.

    Again, I'm no Kleep expert, but from what I've found (articles, ads, blogs, etc) I don't think he needs to rebrand himself at all. You can never know whether the winner of a primary will come out of it stronger or weaker than they went in. Sometimes a hard primary makes you grow, polish your message and delivery, nurture a great staff, etc... but they also sometimes give the other side a whole lot of ammunition, especially when the other side gets to run around raising money and lob bombs at the guys in the primary while they go after each other.

    Stenberg WAS and IS a weak candidate. So was Ricketts, and of course Kleeb would start off as an underdog, but much stranger things happen every election.

    "When I look inside and see that I am nothing, that is wisdom. When I look outside and see that I am everything, that is love... and between those two, my life turns." -Nisargadatta Maharaj


    [ Parent ]
    but... (0.00 / 0)
    The whole point of my post was that if Fahey were to get in Kleb would be the weaker candidate of the two.

    [ Parent ]
    revision: (0.00 / 0)
    Just to clarify my previous post I meant that Kleeb would not get in.

    [ Parent ]
    I got that... (0.00 / 0)
    ... and I respectfully disagree. But one can never know and it doesn't matter anyway.

    "When I look inside and see that I am nothing, that is wisdom. When I look outside and see that I am everything, that is love... and between those two, my life turns." -Nisargadatta Maharaj

    [ Parent ]
    Thanks for the Republican talking points. (0.00 / 0)
    If the Nebraska Democratic Party can get off its collective duffs and construct a real grassroots organization - one dependent upon genuinely instituting the much vaunted "93 County Strategy," empowering the County Chairs Organization, and getting away from the so-called "Coordinated Campaign" mentality - then I could see Scott Kleeb cleaning any Republican's clock in the 2008 Senate race.

    I do agree that it is a shame that Bob Kerrey and Mike Fahey had to play their little bluffing games before Scott could "consider" anteing up in the Senate race, but with Ben Nelson holding the deck that controls the NDP, what else could you expect? I just wish Scott would insist on a new deck, get dealt a fair hand, and play his own cards as he sees 'em.

    I'm also hoping that Scott won't just be playing a game of solitare on our side of the table if he decides to chip in. We need players in the House as well.


    [ Parent ]
    hmm (0.00 / 0)
    Are there active county chairs in each county who have the knowledge, ability and are willing to put in the work necessary to run effective organizing?

    Cuz if not then there is no point in empowering them and a coordinated campaign would probably work out better.

    ...and a 'real grassroots organization' requires a bunch of people willing to put in lots of hours, a hard enough thing to do anywhere, much less areas with few left leaning people in the first place, so its not like we could just decide to have a grassroots network and it be there overnight, or even in a year or two.

    Then again (here I go again), if the party made a sincere effort at bringing soft republicans and independents into the fold... opening the party up like a real 'big tent' then you'd open yourself up to a bigger pool of potential volunteers, which is definately possible with a great candidate like Kleeb and the timing would be perfect because of the discontent with the Republican party.

    "When I look inside and see that I am nothing, that is wisdom. When I look outside and see that I am everything, that is love... and between those two, my life turns." -Nisargadatta Maharaj


    [ Parent ]
    Grassroots. (0.00 / 0)
    Heck no there aren't active county chairs in each county. There was a lot of talk about organizing every county across the state, emulating Howard Dean's 50-State Strategy, but little was actually accomplished. In fact, since I became a county chair the 3rd CD has actually had a net decline in the number of organized counties.

    There has never been a county chairs meeting, per se, since last year's NDP State Convention. There is no more newsletter, no listserve such as the one available to SCC members, no attempt at organizing county chairs other than that done by the chairs themselves along with their neighboring counties.

    If we want to turn everything, once again, over to a "coordinated campaign" we can expect the same kind of results. Whoever is "driving" the CC will spend all kinds of money and effort on their own campaign and pay lip service to everyone else. That is hardly the formula for building a long-lasting, strong, permanent, organized party structure. Coordinated campaigns are, by their very nature, a fly-by-night organization.

    Volunteers come forward when they see something they are willing to fight for. I agree with you Sol, the time is ripe for change.


    [ Parent ]
    Say what you will... (0.00 / 0)
    about the coordinated campaign, but it's hard to argue with the results in the Nelson race or the early voting campaign. If we can expect the same kind of results from them this year, considering that Kleeb would be the focus of any CC efforts, I think most of us would be pretty happy.

    [ Parent ]
    Results (0.00 / 0)
    The Ben Nelson re-election campaign, aka, the Coordinated Campaign was very successful, I will agree. It got Ben Nelson re-elected. It did very little to grow the party and fill the ranks of our bull pen.

    Glad you are happy with Ben Nelson Dave, I'm not. A lot of good Democrats will tell you that they voted for him but had to hold their noses while they did it.

    A new wave of Democrats will be voted into the House and Senate from all over the U.S. next year. We will still be stuck with with the one "Democratic" Senator that loves to give George W. Bush nearly everything he wants. He just gave him Mukasey as our new Attorney General.

    Satisfied?


    [ Parent ]
    Listen... (0.00 / 0)
    I was not happy with the overall result in 2006. But it's not a true statement to say that a coordinated campaign like Nelson's in 2006 would not help Scott Kleeb in a campaign for Senate.

    The first step is finding candidates for these house races...


    [ Parent ]
    The truth is . . . (0.00 / 0)
    a "coordinated campaign like Nelson's" would have the same kind of results as Nelson's. Sure, it could help Kleeb, but we need something different. We need something that helps to grow the Democratic Party in Nebraska. We need something that helps our causes, not just our candidates.


    [ Parent ]
    I agree... (0.00 / 0)
    that the model from 2006 isn't the best model. But they did some things incredibly well (early voting, to name just one), and I hope that we can have an operation that takes the things the CC did well in '06 this time around.

    [ Parent ]
    Do something about it... (0.00 / 0)
    I know you how active you are but try to see if you get those counties fired up and ready to go.  Help with organization, and resources, and what not.  I'm sure they would appreciate it.  Train them, whatever you think will work.  I would love to see that happen.

    If the state party isn't stepping up then it is our job to do it.

    Nebraska Netroots | A new community blog for Nebraska Democrats!


    [ Parent ]
    We are. (0.00 / 0)
    One thing that we are attempting to do in the 3rd CD is to get our Congressional District Organization up and running. Thankfully, Joe Shoemaker, our past CD3 Chair, understood that the NDP Constitution and Bylaws establishes those and he got us started.

    Those of us working at getting the CDO going are doing so with the goal of building the party, not running campaigns. In fact, we hope that we will be able to get our own bylaws to prohibit the direct contribution to, or financing of campaigns. Its purpose will, hopefully, be to strenghten the party, not individuals.

    Doing all that requires money, we are also working at raising funds for the CDO that are separate from the resources the NDP state office controls. This will allow us to pay milage and expenses for those county chairs or volunteers that travel to recruit other county chairs, volunteers, and in the future, candidates.

    With leadership that genuinely wants a grassroots organization, this should already have been done. Unfortunately the hierarchy of the NDP has, in the past several years, been focused on one thing and one thing only - maintaining the status quo. That means concentrating all the power of the party at the top, not in the hands of the rank and file where it truly belongs.

    Rather than blowing our resources on junkets to meetings hither and yon that produce no growth in our party but further the careers of those who attend them, we expect to guarantee that the resources of the 3rd CDO go to actually serving the Democrats of this district.


    [ Parent ]
    You're right (0.00 / 0)
    Campaigns are circumstantial, and those circumstances change.  But we have to start from somewhere, and Kleeb measures up damn well against the best benchmark we have, which is the 2000 Senate race.

    BTW, those circumstances that change aren't entirely out of our control.  People are not at the mercy of politics, people are politics.  And if you surrender that potential to change simply because the odds are against you, well... you certainly deserve credit for paying attention, but not for being smart.  We have more political power than any people at any time in the history of the world.  And now, we have a rare opportunity to excercise that power for the good of our state.  All we need now is some blood and some sweat; I'm afraid we already have more than our fair share of tears.


    [ Parent ]
    My apologies (0.00 / 0)
    For some reason, I confused you for a cynical Democrat.  That'll teach me to try and blog at work. 

    [ Parent ]
    Omaha voted for a Democratic novice in 2006 over their own four term incumbent Congressman? (0.00 / 0)
    I'm not sure that's an accurate statement.  I have never seen the precinct by precinct results for NE-2, but I was watching intently what happened on election night.  As I remember it, Esch was winning as the early on, but as West Omaha's results started to come in, it turned in Terry's favor and only got worse as the night dragged on.

    New Nebraska Network
    Not Just Red to Blue - More than One Label for Another


    Active Users
    Currently 3 user(s) logged on.

    Menu

    Make a New Account

    Username:

    Password:



    Forget your username or password?


    NNN on Twitter

    101st Legislature

    Progressive Partners
  • Coalition For Lifesaving Cures
  • Nebraskans For Obama
  • Change That Works - Nebraska
  • Nebraska Democratic Party
  • Nebraska Young Democrats
  • Nebraskans for Peace
  • Center for Rural Affairs
  • Nebraska Appleseed Center
  • Center for People in Need
  • ACLU Nebraska
  • Sierra Club Nebraska
  • Common Cause Nebraska
  • Voices For Children
  • Opportunity@Work
  • Power Up Nebraska

  • Politicians & Candidates
  • Tom White for Congress (D-02)
  • Mark Lakers for Governor (D)
  • Mark Stoj for Treasurer (D)
  • Janet Stewart for Sec/State (D)
  • Rebekah Davis for Cong. (D-03)
  • Lee Terry for Congress (R-02)
  • Dave Heineman for Governor (R)
  • Tom Nesbitt for Treasurer (R)
  • Tony Fulton for Treasurer (R)
  • Don Stenberg for Treasurer (R)
  • John Gale for Sec/State (R)
  • Adrian Smith for Congress (R-03)
  • Bruning for Atty Gen (R)
  • Sen. Ben Nelson (D)
  • Sen. Mike Johanns (R)
  • Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (R-01)
  • Rep. Lee Terry (R-02)
  • Rep. Adrian Smith (R-03)
  • Governor's Office
  • Atty General's Office
  • Sec. of State's Office
  • Unicameral Directory
  • Mayor Jim Suttle (D, Omaha)
  • Mayor Chris Beutler (D, Lincoln)
  • Nebraska Democratic Party
  • Nebraska Green Party
  • Nebraska Republican Party

  • Local Media
  • Nebraska State Paper
  • Prairie Fire
  • The Reader
  • North Platte Bulletin
  • Sandhills Express
  • Southwest Nebraska News
  • NET Nebraska Public Radio
  • KFAB Talk Radio (Omaha)
  • KLIN Talk Radio (Lincoln)
  • Channel 3 - CBS (Omaha)
  • Channel 4 - ABC (Kearney)
  • Channel 5 - NBC (Hastings)
  • Channel 6 - NBC (Omaha)
  • Channel 7 - ABC (Omaha)
  • Channel 8 - ABC (Lincoln)
  • Channel 10 - CBS (Lincoln)
  • Channel 42 - Fox (Omaha)

  • Submit a Letter to the Editor
  • Omaha World-Herald
  • Lincoln Journal-Star
  • Daily Nebraskan (UNL)
  • Grand Island Independent
  • Kearney Hub
  • North Platte Telegraph
  • Norfolk Daily News
  • Fremont Tribune
  • Columbus Telegram
  • McCook Daily Gazette
  • Scottsbluff Star-Herald
  • Hastings Tribune

  • Powered by: SoapBlox